This novel has three steps:
- problem,
- solution,
- reason
The reasoning is awesome just as a mathematician would do. The analogies are brilliant - "Even and Odd", "Game of puzzles in a map".
But the astuteness of the detective is unacceptable sometimes. For instance Dupin's reasoning about the minister is as follows:
"As a poet and a mathematician he would reason well. But as a mere mathematician he could not have reasoned at all"
And there is again a reasoning for this statement too.
"The odds are that every popular idea, every accepted convention is a nonsense because it has suited the majority" - Chamfort
And from the novel, I feel that Edgar Allen Poe seems to have grudge on the Parisian Police. The statement "Even a school boy is a better reasoner than he" proves it. The story is about Dupin's knowledge of the robber's knowledge of the loser's knowledge of the robber.
No comments:
Post a Comment